- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:54, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Shreds of Character[edit]
- The Shreds of Character (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find anything to suggest that this self-published book is notable enough for an entry. WP:ITEXISTS, but existing does not make it pass WP:NBOOK and a look through WP:INDIA's newspaper search did not bring up any results in Indian English newspapers. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:49, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:35, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, does not meet WP:NBOOK. References cited in article are not reliable. Google brings up less then 30 links to unreliable sites, WorldCat brings up no library holdings, this appears to be a case of self promotion as article was created by (almost) one article creator, Jasbir pro who appears to be author of the book, Jasbir S Jagdeo, see [1]. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 Talk 13:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as first of all, there's no article for the author and there seems to be nothing to support one and my searches also found nothing good (FWIW, it seems the online reviews for this weren't all that good). SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - searches came up with nothing to show it meets the notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 14:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.