The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  17:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Republicans and The Monarchy[edit]

The Republicans and The Monarchy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

It's a research paper, as it says in one of the early paras. Full of POV and OR Ged UK (talk) 20:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per WP:NOR. Theone00 (talk) 21:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As said above, pretty clear cut original research. —  scetoaux (T|C) 22:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, original research paper. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Could even be speedied, IMO. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 05:19, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete simply WP:OR.   jj137 (talk) 14:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Really no more to be said, but I just wanted to point out the amusing fact that the first item in the "Works Cited" list is a Wikipedia article. AnturiaethwrTalk 16:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not an encyclopedia article. --Stormie (talk) 01:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.