The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow close. I'm going to close this one early, as there is no coverage out there that is independent of the subject and in a reliable place to show that this passes WP:NBOOK. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Remaining, Part One[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self published book released two days ago. No indication of notability per WP:NBOOK. I am unable to find significant discussion of the book in reliable independent sources. ... discospinster _talk 23:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some references of the book:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Idts (talk • contribs) 23:45, 24 March 2014‎

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Sing 23:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete failed to find WP:42 to meet WP:NBOOK. Sam Sailor ^Sing 23:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete would appear to fail WP:BOOK. Although not terribly shocking for a self-published book, Twilight notwithstanding. None of the authors references listed above come close to establishing notability. -- Bfigura ^(talk) 00:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I could find no coverage to demonstrate that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK. Gong show 03:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.