The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 14:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Quentin Collection[edit]

The Quentin Collection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Sources only cover opening of new stores, coverage is not substantial in any way. No non-trivial coverage found. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - sources already establish notability. Attempts to dismiss them as only covering the subject of the article are bizarre. WilyD 14:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, sources meet WP:GNG. The Nordic Goddess Kristen ^{Worship her} 01:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.