The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowball keep. Nothing's wrong with the article. Non-admin closure. Kwsn^(Ni!) 18:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Queers[edit]

The Queers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No sources, not notable, tone, advert Mdbrownmsw 17:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Passes WP:MUSIC at every step. Not a single instance of advertising. Tone adheres to WP:NPOV. Btl 21:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Agree with Btl. Skottapplecore 09:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep looks legit Rackabello 13:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep clearly passes the WP:MUSIC test. They have toured internationally, article includes links from outside sources, etc. Plm209^{(talk to me • contribs)} 13:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Many albums on labels with long lists of other artists and releases. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 14:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - almost a bad faith nomination, almost WP:POINT.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The article is linked to by more than 100 other articles; the group has a lengthy list of releases, has existed for 25 years, has toured extensively, and as noted by Btl it passes WP:MUSIC. They may not be as well known as some groups, but that doesn't make them less notable. Salamurai 16:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - well-established long-time punk band, lots of albums and recognition. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Long-established band with All Music Guide article. Possible speedy under WP:SNOW. Capitalistroadster 02:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.