The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Penguins of Doom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any evidence of notability. Found only Goodreads, e-commerce listings, and tons of unrelated results like The Penguins of Madagascar episodes. Does not even attempt to prove notability, consisting only of plot summary and literary analysis. All sources, none of which are inline, are primary. I haven't checked the publisher or the author, but Blooming Tree Press does not have an article and Greg R. Fishbone is also tagged for notability, listing exactly one other book on his article. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Perfect example of WP:SYNTH. Contains blogs and official website as references which are not considered as reliable sources per WP:GNG. Crafting a well-written and structured article on WP won't make the subject notable. Harsh Rathod Poke me! 13:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as mere PROMO created back when book was published. Searches produce nothing, fails WP:NBOOK.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, it looks to me like his other book and his bio page would also fail WP:GNG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK, hasnt made much of an impression with only a few library holdings, and a gsearch has brought up nothing useable. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.