The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin closure. D.M.N. (talk) 19:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Mexicools[edit]

The Mexicools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable stable. The page doesn't list any titles won. The page provides zero sources. Any information can be kept in the individual's profiles. iMatthew (talk) 14:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep- This AfD is nonsense. This stable was together for more than a year, and you call them non-notable? They have feuded with the top tag teams on Friday Night Smackdown! and dominated in the Cruiserweight Division. Feedback 15:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - I agree with Lex, this stable was together for more than a year. This isn't some Kane and Big Show, or some Jimmy Wang Yang and Shannon Moore. This stable feuded with the top tag teams in the WWE at the time (on SD! of course). They had many title chances and different feuds. Juventud won the CW title with the stable, and being together for more than a year is notable.--TrUcO9311 TaLk / SiGn 16:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alright I see your point. I guess I took the wrong action in this case. Their article can stay, it just needs some major changes. Sorry, I'm still learning. =] iMatthew (talk) 16:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.