The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ansh666 06:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Mass Missile[edit]

The Mass Missile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable band, fails WP:BAND JudeccaXIII (talk) 21:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Albums being produced by a popular company does not make this group notable, neither does the context of both WP:NBAND and WP:NALBUM indicate/support your argument. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 08:29, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What has NALBUM got to do with anything? WP:NBAND criterion 5 is "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels". Three albums on Sony clearly satisfies that. --Michig (talk) 08:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't see #s 4 & 5 criteria. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 08:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.