The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Madhouse: A critical study of Swedish society[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to lack any coverage in reliable sources, let alone significant coverage that would satisfy WP:NBOOK; this is unsurprising, because it's self-published. If you look at the creator's username, it's fairly obvious that he's trying to use Wikipedia to publicize his own book. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:35, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. — Beloved Freak 03:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Beloved Freak 03:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't see any indication of notability in the article, and can find no significant coverage in reliable sources. --Beloved Freak 03:17, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fairly clear conflict of interest. Asnac (talk) 15:28, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As best as I can tell, it fails WP:NBOOKS and WP:GNG. Qrsdogg (talk) 23:25, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.