The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As no evidence has been presented in favor of this article being preserved, this article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:20, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Lutheran Study Bible[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NB. Basileias (talk) 03:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment why did you wait a week on this one? Skippypeanuts (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to wait to see the results from the other Lutheran study Bible article. If sources were produced from there, that could affect this article, then it would justify keeping it. Basileias (talk) 02:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not that it matters Skippypeanuts (talk) 17:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence has been presented that this particular edition of the Bible satisfies WP:N. Edison (talk) 19:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:01, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NB. @Skippypeanuts: your !vote is somewhat lacking; care to explain? Tigraan (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.