The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 17:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the criteria state: "Has received non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country." — there is zero coverage from a reliable source. The article is based on references from primary sources (e.g. myspace/mp3.au etc)/. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 21:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The site you referenced is merely a directory of local bands, listing some 3000 artists/groups in the local area. It doesn't distinguish why the Lazys are notable and worthy of inclusion. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 19:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll go for a Keep too. They've achieved something, unlike a lot of the bands that try to get pages on here to get known without the hard work. Could do with outside references, though. Peridon (talk) 21:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no significant independent 3rd party notability. Current references are limited to MySpace and a passing mention in FasterLouder. Fails WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 03:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication of multisourced notability. A-Kartoffel (talk) 07:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.