The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Due to the lack of reliable sources for verification and notability. Davewild (talk) 19:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Kamar[edit]

This is a non-notable religion, and the page itself gives no indication of notability, just a description of the religion and its principles. Google turns up no relevant hits for "Kamar religion" besides the Wikipedia article. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 23:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this article is probably a hoax. Even if it wasn't, it would be a non-notable religion. In the opening line of the article, the creator says, "There are very few followers of this religion." Furthermore, Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Cunard (talk) 01:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, it could be a hoax; I figured that it seemed a bit too generic of a religion to be a hoax, but it is possible that it's just a non-creative hoax, in which case this should definitely be deleted. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 01:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete religioncruft. JuJube (talk) 02:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N, possible hoax given total lack of sources. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 08:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.