The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Hill (Boulder)[edit]

The Hill (Boulder) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is the definition of WP:OR and it is unlikely that any sources can be found that would change that. CombatWombat42 (talk) 21:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I don't know how the nom jumped to such a brash conclusion when it only took a second or two googling to find sources supporting a lot of what's in the article, not to mention this neighborhood's notability. [1][2][3] Was WP:BEFORE not followed? Even the Boulder Convention and Visitor's Bureau has a page dedicated to it. [4] I'd be open for this to be moved to its official name, University Hill (Boulder) ("University Hill" is a disamb page). --Oakshade (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Should probably be moved to University Hill (Boulder, Colorado) or to Hill District (Boulder Colorado). But see Hill District neighborhood listing, and see this coverage of the University Hill riot of 1997. It's a notorious / notable area! --doncram 22:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Noms should not speculate about sources, they need to do a search WP:BEFORE nominating. Sources are readily available. WP:OR is not a valid reason to delete. ~KvnG 13:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Sources are available contrary to nominators statement.Coffeepusher (talk) 18:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.