The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Delete and salt. MelanieN (talk) 03:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The closing script messed up somehow, and I can't figure out how to fix it. If anyone can, please do! --MelanieN (talk) 03:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, User:Malcolmxl5! --MelanieN (talk) 14:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Hijabophobia[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Hijabophobia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Incoherent personal essay. The topic might be worthy of an article, but there's nothing salvageable here. PROD removed without comment. —swpb^T 23:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. —swpb^T 23:01, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article deals with attitudes toward hijab, but appears to have been written from a personal point of view rather than a neutral point of view. It also appears to have been poorly translated from another language, because almost every sentence (except the last) contains some grammatical error or misphrasing that makes the article difficult to understand. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WP:G4 speedy delete, still for the same reasons as in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hijabophobia. - HyperGaruda (talk) 06:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WP:G4 Speedy delete, still for the same reasons as in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hijabophobia.- ArtsRescuer • Talk me 11:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely make-believe concept. There is no such thing as "hijabophobia", only understandable outrage that theocratic zealots are trying to forcibly impose prudish standards of female dress on the world. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:17, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Delete as nothing minimally better convincing for an acceptable Wikipedia article at all. Enough consensus here, SwisterTwister talk 01:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.