The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 03:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Game Show[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article tagged with issue for over 5 years. No third-party sources to show notability, delete. Otterathome (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This article survived a PROD in 2009 based on the claim that the topic was covered by RSes like G4TV. The ref that was added (and still exists in the article) does indeed cover the topic so it's not accurate to say that no third party sources exist. Finding good sourcing is a bit of a challenge since the name is so generic. There may not be much so I decline to !vote "keep" at present. -Thibbs (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not identify it as truly independant as it looks like G4 & The Game Show people come from the same set of companies Revision3#History, so are current or previous colleagues. This is also explains why there's so many guests from G4TV in its episodes.--Otterathome (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.