The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:15, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Flywheel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable first novel. Worldcat shows it in only 37 libraries. Unwisely accepted from AfD. (ann article on a first novel ought to be a warning sign to check further before acceptance) DGG ( talk ) 04:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I think that the reason for acceptance was likely due to the award, which initially sounds impressive (since it's by a large publisher) but doesn't appear to really be all that notable. A search for the award doesn't bring up anything and at best this may be considered something that may give slight notability but not complete notability (in other words, not a major award). In all fairness, this is something that's frequently the source of a lot of confusion since Wikipedia's standards for award notability are extremely strict out of necessity (since there are just so many awards out there). That said, I can't really find any coverage for this book in reliable sources. There are some blog reviews, but not even really a whisper of news coverage. It's possible that there are more articles out there, but the lack of libraries holding the book is usually a fairly big tell when it comes to whether or not coverage is out there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The Kill Your Darlings might be reliable, but the the other sources are either primary or very brief. I didn't find anything else, so there isn't enough sourcing to establish notability or write an article around. Pinging @Oo7565: who accepted this at AfC for input. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above, sources do not indicate notability, and the award is from the publisher which makes me think it's just promotional. Primefac (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.