The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Ex Box Boys[edit]

The Ex Box Boys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I've held off on this article to give the originator the chance to assert notability. I feel that sufficient time has elapsed without that notability being asserted, nor evident from my own researches, to hold the article up to community scrutiny. While individual members may play in bands that may be notable, and while the "XBox/Ex Box" link appears at first sight to be notable I believe that this band does not currently make the notable bands list. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 00:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now I can understand that some people may think this is yet another boy band, one hit wonder, but apparently and if you look into all the sites I kept adding as sources, they are very popular in the gaming world, and look like they will be sticking around for a while to come.
If you are worried they do not deserve their page in this encyclopedia that is an opinion everyone deserves to have for their personal reasons, but there are plenty that will disagree, an opinion which should be respected just as much.
As to "orphan", "Cite", "Category", "Wikify", I have read through all the steps, tried each and every single suggestion, and somehow it still get deleted as do links, cites and "wikifications". So if this is the problem, is there anyone who would like to brush it up to Wikipedia standards and let the XBox geeks have their page?--Jenny Blaze (talk) 00:56, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The challenge is that the citations must come form reliable sources. Get those and you have solved the main problem. Other stuff can be weeded out and added at any time. Fail to get those that there is a strong probability that the article will not survive at the moment. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 01:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.