The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep as notable. (non-admin closure) _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:38, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Day of the Donald[edit]

The Day of the Donald (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor satire book, fails WP:NBOOK. — JFG ^talk 04:30, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:52, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, It has widespread coverage in reputable media outlets, including two articles about it in the New York Times, coverage in the The Washington Post and hundreds of RS. Prince of Thieves (talk) 10:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, I added one extra cite to show noteworthiness. However, I did not add more because it would be over cited. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:13, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The criteria for books is terribly low; this one clearly meets and supersedes it for whatever that is worth. Again, I do not like that the bar is set so low, but we are not here to discuss a change in guidelines.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• crap keep the standard of "it got some reviews" is too low, but this obviously meets it. There's obviously not going to be any sustained interest in this book, but there's no way to get the bad sub-standard adjusted to actually meet WP:GNG. Mangoe (talk) 18:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, it has coverage in reliable sources. --Doncram (talk) 03:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.