The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Complete lack of notability, no updates since tagged for notability in Aug07 Booglamay (talk) 23:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Its a stub. Articles don't have to grow to be kept. It is not an advertisement, and it is encyclopedically written. There is no reason to delete this page. Fresheneesz (talk) 23:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There is nothing in the article that demonstrates that this group passes WP:MUSIC in any way whatsoever.-h i ss p a c er e s e a r c h 02:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Couldn't find much from a Google search. The 3 CDs appear to be self-released, and their current tour appears to be limited to pub venues in the London area. Without some significant independent coverage, I don't think we can keep this. If some demonstration of passing WP:MUSIC could be added, I would be happy to reconsider.--Michig (talk) 09:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nor could I. No evidence that this passes WP:MUSIC. Stubs aren't immune to challenge just because they're stubs. RGTraynor 10:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KeepWeak Keep: The band seems to be quite notable. They do have a website of their own. It just requires more references and citations -
Comment: Just out of curiosity, what elements of WP:MUSIC do you believe this band fulfills, and upon what basis do you conclude that it "seems to be quite notable?" RGTraynor 09:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.