The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Obvious hoax and borderline A1 nonsense. szyslak 09:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - hoax. Neither Google nor IMDB [1]) returned any results. Kal[talk] 09:52, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, "hoax" is not a valid speedy criterion. I wish it could be speedied, though. szyslak 09:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I had only read WP:CSD#G3, which includes "blatant and obvious hoaxes and misinformation." I didn't think of checking WP:HOAX, which says "hoaxes are generally not speedy deletion candidates." Kal[talk] 11:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But in this case, this is not "obscure" at all, this is a really obvious blatant hoax. CSD3 applies. Cenarium (talk) 01:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube (talk) 11:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoax. — BillCtalk 13:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - It's the work of a serial hoax creator. Cenarium (talk) 00:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, and because of this I've tagged this person's later work for speedy deletion as blatant vandalism. szyslak 04:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, after having looked over the article, as I was unable to locate any sources on dogpile.com and agree that the article looks like a hoax. Do they mean Beetlejuice? Plus, the article creator seems to be making vandalism edits: [2], [3], etc. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 01:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.