The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted under CSD: G11. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Analyst (Novel Series)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book series, failing WP:GNG, self-published by a non-notable author. Two refs in the article are to a blog, the other is to a dead website (and one that is almost certainly not a WP:RS). No evidence of any awards of any kind, or major reviews, etc. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (talkin' to me?) @ 22:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are no sources out there that would show that this series would pass notability guidelines for books. It also doesn't help that the article reads like a promotion for the series and I've tagged it with a speedy for just that reason. It doesn't help that it links to the Amazon sale pages and every social media site that the author happens to be on. If by some chance it doesn't pass, I did want to voice a deletion opinion here. There's no notability here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:28, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.