The result was keep. Consensus is that sources found provide evidence of notability. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 15:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not state notability. I did a quick Google search on the article to see if I could find any sources and I couldn't. I would contact the initial editor before tagging but they have no edits since 2007 and there is a notice on their userpage saying they have retired. I therfore think that this article should be deleted on notability grounds. Oddbodz (talk) 17:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)*Keep but those supporting a rescue should actually provide inline citations, rather than telling the rest of us how it can be done.[reply]