The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 00:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You (Amanda Lear song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable single; did not chart. Orange Mike | Talk 00:03, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
...but the text includes sourced sales information, and the article is definitely long enough. It should stay. 1000MHz (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The single doesn't meet the notability guidelines for albums. The length of the article doesn't make the subject inherently notable. I agree that sourced sales information is better than not sourced, but 40,000, 100,000, or a million sold copies is unhelpful if the single isn't covered by reliable third-party sources. So far, her music video on YouTube, a track listing and album display on a cheap website, and a non-notable music ratings page are not sufficient independent sources. --I Jethrobot (talk) 17:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.