The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as a copyrights violation. El_C 19:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thalattosuchian[edit]

Thalattosuchian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Text written in the page is a copy of a FOX news article that contains numerous errors. In addition, the page on a single specimen of an unnamed and undescribed species, of which there is also currently no specimen number assigned to this specimen (not in a museum collection). The information currently in the article can easily be added to the Thalattosuchia page, and once the species is described and published a new page can be made for it. Having separate pages for Thalattosuchia and Thalattosuchian is confusing, especially as the thalattosuchian page is about a single specimen. Mark t young 17:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete seeing as it's copyvio from the Fox News article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 17:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete - copyvio, does seem a little adverticious in the opening paragraph Onnaghar(_T/^C) 18:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.