The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teomara Rutherford[edit]

Teomara Rutherford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable photographer per coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources requirement of WP:BIO. Using either the page title or the shortened first name mentioned in the article itself, Google returns only business directories, forums postings, and trivial mentions which indicates acceptable sources do not exist to establish notability. Doctorfluffy (talk) 03:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 06:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Johnbod (talk) 09:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Modernist (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No significant coverage. Epbr123 (talk) 00:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.