The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. If some editors wants some content to be merged, please contact me on my talk page.--JForget 00:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tengshu[edit]

article is about a non-notable fictional character. Prod was removed. Mh29255 (talk) 01:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages from the same novel because they don't meet the requirements of WP:FICTION:

Delete all, overly detailed plot summaries written in-universe; they don't establish any real world notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, perahps worth a mention or breif description on the novel's page but an individual article for each is too much - Dumelow (talk) 13:24, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Perhaps merging relevant info with the novel's article. Rsazevedo ^msg 23:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless coverage from real world sources are found Corpx (talk) 10:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into a combination article. given that the series is apparently a New York Times bestselling book series, its important enough. I agree individual articles are excessive at this point. DGG (talk) 23:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Enigmaman (talk) 01:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge i agree with DGG. Merging would be best. -munkee_madness talk 19:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do not Delete Possibly merging would be better. The series is a New York Times Bestseller and its characters are important to the plot. All characters in the articles stated above are also relivent.-Myrrthe

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY ^talk _contribs 04:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Tengshu and Doc finebeak are not vey productive. i think they should be deleted.70.217.148.84 (talk) 13:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.