The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 16:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just because articles exist for the members doesn't mean all tag team article should be deleted. The articles on the team provide more in-depth info to prevent the main articles from being bloated. In this case, they've done nothing notable as a team, however. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 01:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Non-notable tag team. Tavix (talk) 02:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ultra speedy delete only because the very first line in the article is patently wrong. They formed at Night of Champions, and didn't even appear at Great American Bash. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.46.131 (talk) 06:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable tag team. WWF (oops excuse me WWE) has been putting teams together for years not all of them are notable and this one definitely isn't. No prejudice against recreation when they achieve something notable though. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can We just have it up for a month or two please? i will do any thing!! Dmanskater11 (talk) 15:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Anything you say? Are you familiar with that episode of the Brady Bunch when Peter was Greg's slave for a week? Darrenhusted (talk) 13:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom 1362talk 15:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.