The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lil' Kim. J04n(talk page) 12:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TeamLilKim[edit]

But the BeyHive has their own Wiki page. I'm not understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chibanks (talk • contribs) 03:08, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notability according to policy, lack of reliable sources (mostly referenced to youtube and twitter comments). I appreciate the sentiment but the artist (Lil' Kim) is notable enough for her own article but the fandom is not, at best some of this could be incorporated on her article. James of UR (talk) 13:15, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Lil' Kim, which already includes discussion of her rivalries, feuds with Minaj, etc. I'm not sure that the Sherri Shepherd bullying case needs to be discussed here: it was the action of a few fans. Even Lady Gaga fandom, which is more notable, doesn't get its own page: Little monsters (fan) redirects to Lady Gaga. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:25, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:25, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 4/14 references are valid; the rest are long unfocused YouTube fanvids and Twitter links (and we're not a blog so that Twitter image shouldn't be there in the article). Fan feud with little impact in any way in real life outside of police reports, and I'm sure the vast majority of the subject's fans don't support the efforts of this group at all. Nate • (chatter) 19:40, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article isn't needed here.It needs cleanup.--Nikinikolananov (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.