The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 07:26, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tao chen kung fu[edit]

Tao chen kung fu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unsourced article about a martial art that makes no claims of notability. My search found nothing that shows notability and no independent reliable sources that even discuss this art. The best I could find was Wikipedia mirrors. Papaursa (talk) 03:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Papaursa (talk) 03:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Sources are unreliable and too little to count. hmssolent\Let's convene 05:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There's no claim of notability in the article and it meets none of WP:MANOTE, plus it has no reliable sources (nor could I find any). Astudent0 (talk) 17:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No indication of notability. Janggeom (talk) 07:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.