- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Tamashii (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notable event. No in-deep coverage of the event. 11 sources, 7 are from the promotion so it's primary source. Also, Post Wrestling and Fightful are just results of the event with no in-deep coverage, so it's WP:ROUTINE. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Nothing found in New Zealand media other than an event notification NealeWellington (talk) 07:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I've dig up a Yahoo Article advertising the events, as well as a second that mentions the event in Sydney. Also want to Ping @TheDeviantPro and @KatoKungLee since they've been involved in similar NJPW discussions in the past. Thief-River-Faller (talk) 14:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This is a list type of article covering an ongoing series of events, not an article for a single event, where the sum of the whole is greater than each individual part. There's previews and results and I'm not sure what else is expected here. I added more references, there's more I didn't add and these events are still ongoing so there's going to be continuing coverage. I see no issue with this.KatoKungLee (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - More third party references have been added, as stated above, this is regarding a series of events, with ongoing coverage. Thief-River-Faller (talk) 16:40, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Third party sources were added, but again, it's just WP:ROUTINE coverage. "routine news coverage of such things as announcements are not sufficient basis for an article. Planned coverage of scheduled events, especially when those involved in the event are also promoting it, is considered to be routine" --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Page is too small for event for me to be even consider supporting to stay. Im not sure how five routine sources could be considered enough to be notable. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further input regarding routine v non-routine needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Although independent sources have been added, they all fail WP:ROUTINE. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 01:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - More sources have again been added.KatoKungLee (talk) 02:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Again, sources are just WP:ROUTINE. [1] [2] [3] These are just results, which is WP:ROUTINE. 3 other sources [4] [5] [6] just covers the launch of the brand, which is already sourced. (we have 7 sources for the launch) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 08:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Just covers the launch of the brand' but this page isn't for a specific event, it is for the brand/event series as a whole, meaning these references would surely be useful in this case? Thief-River-Faller (talk) 11:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.