The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --jonny-mt 02:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tahiri Veila[edit]

Tahiri Veila (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article lacks any major, independent third party references, and thus does not comply with WP:N. TheNobleSith (talk) 00:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{talk to me} 16:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete NN, even in-universe. No sources. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 04:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Added sources. ChessCreator (talk) 03:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of third-party sources. Put another way, no sources other than SW ones make any mention of this subject. Thus, it does not comply with WP:N. TheNobleSith (talk) 19:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.