The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  21:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tabatha Jordan[edit]

Hardly notable. She does not have any accomplishments that bring her above the big-bust, breast-flashing mediocrity that pervades the internet. No awards or citations in her "profession" to make her notable. Has only done 30 movies in less than 8 years, and has very little in the way of magazine appearances. Thus, delete. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 01:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep I am afraid Ms. Jordan is obviously notable, esp. on account of the assymmetrical breasts. j/k. the.crazy.russian ^{vent here} 02:28, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Not someone i care to learn much about, but she has been in multiple "independent" films and is clearly a notable person in accordance with WP:BIO. Just because you don't like her or the porn industry doesn't mean that others won't want to learn something about Ms. Jordan. AmiDaniel 02:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Doesn't break any policies. MadCow257 02:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Wikipedia is full of big boobs, not to say about real sicko stuff. One more will not make difference. mikka (t) 03:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment. Full of big boobs? I must be editing the wrong articles! Bucketsofg 05:43, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  I could have shown you places, but I don't know your age. :-) mikka (t) 17:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep per all. --Terence Ong 03:38, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Calsicol 04:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nn porncruft.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 07:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable. I have absolutely no moral objection, she just doesn't appear to be notable as a few minor porn roles in a relatively unsuccessful career doesn't strike me as notability MLA 09:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nothing to do with morals - simply not-notable, and not encyclopedic. VirtualSteve 11:45, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, 30 porn movies in 8 years is nothing; most titty stars appear in hundreds upon hundreds of these things. Not notable. Proto||type 14:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; article indicates short porn career (where do the 30 films come from; article lists only 8, some recycled) followed by long stint selling dirty pictures of herself via own website, hardly a notable effort unless every "model" with a webcam is notable. Monicasdude 15:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Response: Film number comes from Tabatha Jordans IAFD entry. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 21:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nn Funky Monkey 17:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. An excellent addition to our coverage of the genre. Article states she has won an award and thus no good reason to deprive Ms. Jordan of her well deserved place here. -- JJay 17:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nothing to set her apart from the millions of other pornographic actors/actresses. Andy Saunders 18:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Proto... she simply is not notable in her chosen profession.--Isotope23 18:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Asymmetrical breasts? That might be notable... somehow... I guess. ProhibitOnions 19:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Only if she plans on suing her plastic surgeon...--Isotope23 01:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Notable within the genre. I believe this article has previously survived AFD once before. In lieu of any sort of overall policy regarding porn-related articles, this one passes the notability bar. 23skidoo 20:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability and sounds like a story created by ten-year-olds. —Eternal Equinox | talk 21:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. There are plenty of whores with webcams calling themselves models, but this isn't one to record for the ages. She's got her own website, so I don't see why Wikipedia needs to have a page on her. Brian G. Crawford 23:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Tits. Herostratus 15:31, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not notable. -- infinity0 15:31, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.