The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Taal-Net Group of Schools[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is with great trepidation that I bring this to AfD, given WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and all. But, despite my efforts, I couldn't establish this meeting WP:GNG. Additionally, it is written so promotionally, it's hard to think it could survive without a total rewrite. I'm happy to be wrong about this, but this entirely unsourced private school article seems to warrant a deletion discussion. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:53, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:53, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:53, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: G11 material for sure - I've tagged it. DrStrauss talk 15:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.