The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango 123 15:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TVAus[edit]

ATTENTION!

If you came to this page because a friend asked you to do so, or because you saw a message on an online forum pointing to this page, please note that this is not a vote. This is a discussion among Wikipedia editors and is aimed at reaching a consensus on whether the article is suitable for this encyclopedia. The outcome of AfD nominations are primarily determined by the quality of arguments for or against deletion; the process is immune to ballot-stuffing or sockpuppetry.

You can participate in the discussion and post your opinions here, even if you are new. Deletion is based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, so please take a look at them if you have not already. For more information, see Wikipedia deletion policy.

Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!

Non-notable website. Fails WP:WEB. Alexa traffic ranking of: 1,831,570. - Motor (talk) 08:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE, Pre-existing thread at tvaus.com.au. Quote: "i was looking on wikipedia today one of my fav sites and i was thinging it would be fantastic if tvaus had its own wikipage. There will be sizeable cash rewards for anyone who adds to our wikipage. I would have created it my self however i dont think thats in the true sprit of the wiki... so first person to read this and who knows what i am talking about head over and create a page under the title of "tvaus"." - Motor (talk) 08:55, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 08:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Steve-Ho 11:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, why would you want an article on a tv forum?--Andeh 11:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. 176 Google hits, no independent reliable sources mention the site, this sure is non-notable. Kimchi.sg 12:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to bad-faith creation of the article in the first place. --Elkman 14:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of above. - Tangotango 16:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Bad says, "Delete that crap!" ~ Porphyric Hemophiliac § 16:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Starionwolf 18:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence that this forum meets WP:WEB. Capitalistroadster 01:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 01:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 03:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
While I am tempted by the "strong cash rewards" to add to the page, I must vote Delete for all the reasons given above. --Roisterer 14:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 14:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obviously spam and NPOV. - Mike Beckham 21:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mike Beckham.--Auger Martel 12:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.