The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:20, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TIPA Corp[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and WP:SIRS. Routine business, funding news, PR and press-releases. scope_creep^Talk 09:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 10:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- scope_creep, I just added a source about research articles by the Israeli governmental Agricultural Research Organization, focusing on the packaging produced by TIPA Corp. I hope this source is acceptable. Uziel302 (talk) 19:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Uziel302: Are you specifically talking about this article [1]? The low-citation article (In a low-citation field right-enough) that "the packaging was supplied by TIPA" and "the packaging was manufactured by TIPA". None of those two passing mention indicate why it is notable, they merely verify it exists. scope_creep^Talk 11:49, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Lets examine the first block of references which are 12 entries for this startup.

[2] A trade publication where you need to apply to be included in the FoodTech 500. Not an independent source. Fails WP:SIRS.
[3] Routine annoucement of expansion. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as: of the expansions, acquisitions, mergers, sale, or closure of the business Press-release. Not independent. Fails WP:SIRS
[4] Patents. Non-RS.
[5] From a press-release. Fails WP:SIRS
[6] An X of Y article. 11 Finalists of Calcalist’s Foodtech Innovation Competition. A kind of industrial trade award driven by KPMG. More PR. Not independent. Its a startup contest. Fails WP:SIRS
[7] Press-release. Fails WP:SIRS
[8] TIPA site. Not independent. Fails WP:SIRS
[9] TIPA listing. Not independent. Fails WP:SIRS
[10] Funding news. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
[11] Funding news. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
[12] Funding news. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
[13] Company profile written by the company. Not independent. Fails WP:SIRS

Out of the the 12 references, 3 are funding news, 8 are not independent from the company, 1 is non-rs. Not a single on these references are compliant per policy as being indepdent, significant, reliable and secondary sources. They are junk references. scope_creep^Talk 14:29, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Reads like compilation of promotional materials 🧐. - GizzyCatBella🍁 04:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a company therefore NCORP guidelines apply. Cannot fault the analysis performed by scope_creep above - topic fails NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.