The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 05:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TCS Tarawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

procedural nomination—version brought to AFD: Previously considered at AFD as part of a massive multiple nomination. PROD nominator states: "Does this ship have any real-world notability?" I would answer this with an echoing "no". User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 05:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 05:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, doesn't seem to have any notability outside of the Wing Commander universe. Fails WP:FICTION. Lankiveil (talk) 07:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete and merge. Iceberg3k (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question: into what article would you suggest merging? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • There are several articles about ships and technology in the Wing Commander universe, so it should go into one of them. 12:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iceberg3k (talk • contribs)
• Delete. Unlikely secondary sources exist to establish notability. Doctorfluffy (talk) 15:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.