The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TCGplayer[edit]

TCGplayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable under company and organization notability guidelines. Some sources in Google and has $10 million value but this is not enough to pass the guideline.

Extensively covered by www.syracuse.com and other marketing firms, but little to no independent news. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:50, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.