The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Systems intelligence[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reasons provided in several entries on the article's talk page Espoo (talk) 10:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Not sure. But probably its WP:TOOSOON. As it is said, the concept was introduced in 2002. But till now probably there is not enough researchers from different research groups so the it can be kept in wikipedia. If enough references are added then people can think of keeping the article on Wikipedia. Some references are there in the article. But all the articles are from a single group. Unatnas1986 (talk) 08:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be so little in the whole concept that nobody is interested in commenting on this. To me it is clear that this topic is way below the threshold of acceptable articles. The number of publications on the topic is very low, and the number of citations is very low (and almost exclusively limits to the inventors of the concepts), so this cannot possibly be of general interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.233.179.227 (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 17:22, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A quick web search doesn't show many relevant results, but this seems to be a subset of systems thinking that's largely done by one research group. Maybe merge if it gets notable enough. Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 20:15, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.