The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 12:08, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sync.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NORG notably WP:ORGDEPTH. The sources are 1: company website, 2: passing mention, 3: business directory, 4: a review of product, 5: an article about the company when it was a startup that says "Here’s a startup that can be successful, and if all claims it’s making are indeed true, Dropbox and Google should take note." 6: routine coverage, 7: PR article with quotes from company personnel, 8: company blog, 9: company website Domdeparis (talk) 14:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.