The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No reliable sources or refrences; fails all three criteria for WP:WEBXkeeper 11:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unsure what this page is about, and why it's proposed for deletion. Explain? Bearian 16:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteWikipedia:Notability (software) would be a more appropriate guideline than WP:WEB if it hadn't been rejected. This article is about software used to run web sites, not web content. WP:ORG doesn't feel right because this is free software not produced by a company or other legal organisation. Which leaves WP:N, which this software fails. Non-notable software with only 42 unique non-wikipedia google hits, none of them in apparently reliable sources. JulesH 20:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 11:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - NN freeware, not particularly popular and not even all that good according to the article. Any freeware download site has dozens of similar products. andy 12:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable message board software. Fails WP:COI, as article creator Vystrix Nexoth is named in the article as the developer. Caknuck 19:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it is an unpopular non-notable forum software. — Wenli 00:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.