The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sveiobladet.net[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

online only newspaper for a town with a population of 5000, one possible offline reliable source. almost qualifies for web-content speedy imo. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 21:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 21:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, too minor. Geschichte (talk) 21:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NWEB/WP:GNG. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 20:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.