The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 23:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sustain Cycles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company seems to have folded. No references except for a couple of old product reviews. No significant media coverage in the last five years. Nick Number (talk) 17:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete another run-of-the-mill online retailer who have never been notable, not even from the time I WP:PROD this article 7 years ago thus why the hell was this allowed an article. Donnie Park (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 13:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 13:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article by User:Sustainproducts. The brief product review from BikeRadar in 2007 is not sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH, nor do I see anything better. AllyD (talk) 09:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.