The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Discography articles are very common and legitimate. Discographies that aren't too long may be merged with their main articles, but you don't need AFD for that. Melsaran (talk) 18:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Supergrass discography[edit]

Supergrass discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

indiscriminate collection of information _→AzaToth 18:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Discographies are a recognized and discriminate list that are often found as subarticles for notable bands. --Dhartung | Talk 18:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge There's plenty of room on the main article page for this information. MarkBul 19:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. There is nothing remotely indiscriminate about this. Better as a separate article from the main Supergrass article.--Michig 19:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or Merge. By definition a discography is discriminate. Smashville 21:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, discographies are discriminate, encyclopedic and useful. There is no doubt they are needed when a band has a large number of releases, and this band has an awful lot of singles. J Milburn 23:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge. Discography lists are a good idea when the main article becomes large, but that isn't the case here. As far articles for successful bands go, the Supergrass article is tiny. No reason in having this as a separate artcle, other than to force people to look at two pages, which isn't helpful. Crazysuit 06:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but tidy it up. It looks like a blind chimp has designed the page. Lugnuts 16:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.