The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 00:07, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SupaStishun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not (or barely) meet Wikipedia:MUS, also a case of WP:Auto and thus an ambiguous Wikipedia:POV EmilMarklund (talk) 20:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Yes, barely meets the guidelines in my view, with two pieces in southern rap print magazine Ozone [1][2], winning the BlackPlanet talent search as seen in Vibe [3] and brief mentions of his video work in The Source & RapReviews. The other issues are the proverbial "problems that can be fixed through normal editing" that are not pertinent to deletion. 86.44.16.12 (talk) 15:14, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.