The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:18, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sungusungu[edit]

Sungusungu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Organization stub unref since 2009 Staszek Lem (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawing. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly notable. Dozens of local articles, academic treatment, even an extensive entry in the Routledge International Handbook of Rural Criminology. This is a clear keep. I added a few sources to establish notability, but will be undertaking a more significant rewrite next week. This will be one of those situations where an AfD leads to improvement of an article: as the system should work. Peace. AbstractIllusions (talk) 18:18, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -topic is significant, improve article as needed. Elinruby (talk) 02:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.