The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If the creator of the article would like the content restored to Draft space to improve it, please ask me or any other admin. Black Kite (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhu Tomari[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

Sudhu Tomari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be an amateur film and vanity page that fails WP:NFILM. A search of references finds no coverage by reliable independent sources. Citations are self-published blogs. There are also some hoax-y elements, such as an award linked to self-published photos. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE TO CLOSER: Votes were struck and a notice was placed at the top due to an SPI report. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 15:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

year/type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

long title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bengali:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bengali:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD: Sudhu Tomari শুধু তোমারই

• Neutral It's "ugly", and would benefit from work and use of sources per WP:NEXIST. I found coverage suggesting improvement and sourcing might show WP:NF could be met even for a poorly written article. Note, per WP:NCF the thing needs to be moved to Sudhu Tomari. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  As usual, you're a more generous person than me, Michael. But I see this as part of a walled internet garden aimed at the promotion of a single individual Rajkumar Patra (previously deleted). (See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aranye Maniac Killer Mystery (2014 Short Film) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manab (Music Video 2016) by the same SPA for a clearer picture.) Every source I've checked (IMDb, YouTube channels, Blogspots, Promo sites, "Production Companies", etc.) seems to be created by this same person -- and none of them RS. Also, we need to be careful with searches (and moving titles) because Shudhu Tomari Jonyo is a legitimate Bengali film -- and the term "Jonyo" and its many variations need to be extracted while searching. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep This is not amateur film or promoting anyone or , i vote for the tele film, why not see the credits and screening refs, and the film is exits. :CactusWriter may have any difficulty to finding scores or without reading the article, i believe their many ref about that article, its have to be on wikipedia because theirs many films still have in Wikipedia without any coverage & source. mr. 'Michael' this is the same production & banners those films will made. i ll contact the wikipedia administer before i joining the wikipedia as contrubuter, so if my articles which are legitimate films and you those are nominate them for delete then its not good, please check the works not the source, but i provide to many source as i can. I vote for not to delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yudisina (talk • contribs) 18:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Yudisina (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

* " " Keep " " This Tele film is screening on D.M hall Jhargram in 24 Jan 2014. No bigger coverage bt only covering on local news papers. Also the award program will publish in local magazine 'sarathi' on next day. After it was screening on Hello Kolkata short film festival. See reference on their news paper online. It must be on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.63.191.160 (talk) 08:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC) — 27.63.191.160 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Obviously a sock Black Kite (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - To the administrators, im not included the article publisher. But I have right to vote for.. Wikipedia is about to collect information data all over the world which is really exits or happen. Everyone rights to add articles and wiki editors have rights to Inquiry about them, is it the movie or concept really dose exit? That all! Please change the system of deleting articles from wiki without no reason. The editor are finding reason to delete articles from add. Please check the Tele film first.. The film is published on two film festivals. Some references are in the page still have. But No new coverage the film get. Do you all know News coverages can done with out big notability? Just have spend some money to editors for coverages. ABP, TIMES OF INDIA, ETC.. All is money.. Money can everything not talent. Work and talent will live one. The movie its in imbd site. It is not enough? Its on hello kolkata news coverage media, not enough? Then what need.. Wikipedia is to collect information not delete information. There 1000 of more article is here on wiki which some pages reference are not exits now. And many articles with short information or fake news pages. So I and my 100 supporter will request to Keep the Tele film page for future. Thank you- C — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.191.47.70 (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC) — 223.191.47.70 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Delete None of the sources in the article are actually reliable, and the film fails WP:NFILM. Notability requires coverage in independent reliable sources, which I could not find any. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Discussion Not delete, none of sources are not listed in the web directory, locally know telefilm. the film is now seven days past, i request for 'Nomination Withdraw' & keep the film page, maybe in future we should get any good source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yudisina (talk • contribs) 04:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.