The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sub Surface Catalisation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a case of WP:TOOSOON and WP:NOTSOAPBOX the process has not yet been marketed as tweeted by the company which invented it and this page is clearly for promotional purposes. There are no independent sources cited in the article. Domdeparis (talk) 13:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not implemented and not seeing any basis for referring to the process by this name (and shouldn't it be "Subsurface catalysation"?: Noyster (talk), 12:30, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence the process is used in practice. Possibly a merge into 3D printing#Processes, but even that would be a stretch. GregorB (talk) 18:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.