The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This appears at first blush to be an article about an organization, but on closer examination, it is an article about a website that apparently aspires to be a combination news aggregator and forum. It has been tagged for 4 1/2/ years for having no references, other than in-line links back to the website, and for 3 years as an orphan. I can find no independent, third-party reliable sources about this website whatsoever. Against the possibility that, as a website, it might not get much mainstream press, I took a look at how active it is. On its forums, it claims 915 active members, and a total of a little over 107,000 posts over the course of 11 years (roughly 1000 posts per year), and the scroll on the left side of the page indicates that roughly 40% of those posts are by six users.[1] It has no traffic stats per Alexa[2][3]. The article is entirely promotional, about a website that appears to be the completely non-notable playground of a handful of users. Fladrif (talk) 14:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]