The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Structured wiki[edit]

Structured wiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The article is about a concept, "structured wiki", that doesn't seem to have ever been defined in a notable source. For whatever reason, it doesn't seem to have caught on as a concept the way, say, semantic wiki has. I can't find any examples from scholarly works or the mainstream press that describe such a concept. This might be because the idea is nebulous: as the article itself notes, even a supposedly unstructured wiki like MediaWiki contains categories that can give it structure. It's also not obvious, either from the article or from other online sources, whether the term refers to wikis that contain built-in structures, like blogs and bug-tracking tools; or wikis that allow you to create your own data structures; or both. In short, it's a term that's never been clearly defined and seems to never have been in wide use in the first place. Yaron K. (talk) 20:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Appears to be original reserach. Triplestop x3 02:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. per WP:OR, WP:DICTIONARY, fails to assert notability. -- RUL3R^{*flaming | *vandalism} 04:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.