The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Decepticons. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:20, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be another case of "one man's cruft is another man's important matter". Many people are fans of the Transformers scenarios. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's not really a rational to have hundreds of articles that cannot even satisfy WP:N, let alone other relevant guidelines. I would think most people that care would use Wikia anyway. It allows for more information and images than here, so it would be more relevant to both those interested in the fiction and the toylines. TTN (talk) 22:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect (perhaps smerge) to List of Decepticons, where the subject is mentioned. Gong show 23:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Decepticons. Character is not independently notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.